Large Igneous Provinces: Origin and Environmental Consequences
Andrew D. Saunders – Guest Editors
Table of Contents
Overview
Advertisers
Next Issue
2005 Topics
Overview
Large igneous provinces record major outpourings of igneous rocks, both on the continents and in ocean basins. Their origin is still vigorously disputed, with models invoking mantle plumes, thermal effects of the lithosphere, and meteorite impacts. The environmental consequences are also hotly debated: some argue that voluminous flood basalt volcanism triggered catastrophic changes in the global climate and mass extinctions, whereas others believe their effects much less significant.
- Large Igneous Provinces: Origin and Environmental Consequences
- Large Igneous Provinces and the Mantle Plume Hypothesis
- Large Igneous Provinces, Delamination, and Fertile Mantle
- Meteorite Impacts as Triggers to Large Igneous Provinces
- Gas Fluxes from Flood Basalt Eruptions
- Oceanic LIPs: The Kiss of Death
- The Link between Large Igneous Province Eruptions and Mass Extinctions
Advertisers
Activation Laboratories Ltd. (Actlabs)
CrystalMaker
Elsevier
Environmental Isotope Laboratory
Excalibur Mineral Corporation
Geological Society of London
Granit Publishing
Hudson Institute of Mineralogy
Materials Data (MDI)
Meiji Techno America
Mineral Data Publishing
Rigaku
RockWare
University of Manitoba
Next Issue
v2n1 User Research Facilities in the Earth Sciences
Guest editor: Stephen R. Sutton,
Earth scientists rely on effective access to user research facilities that provide state-of-the-art analytical instrumentation. This thematic issue will focus on some of these facilities and how to use them. Aspects covered include scientific impact, types of facilities and analytical techniques currently available, procedures for gaining access to perform experiments, factors that enable effective usage, and future prospects, particularly in terms of how Earth scientists can best take advantage of new research facilities currently under design and construction.
- User Research Facilities in the Earth Sciences Stephen R. Sutton (University of Chicago)
- User Facilities around the World Gordon E. Brown Jr. (Stanford University and Stanford Synchrotron Radiation Laboratory), Stephen R. Sutton (University of Chicago), and Georges Calas (Université de Paris)
- Synchrotron Radiation, Neutron, and Mass Spectrometry Techniques at User Facilities Stephen R. Sutton (University of Chicago), Marc W. Caffee (Purdue University), and Martin T. Dove (University of Cambridge)
- Scientific Advances Made Possible by User Facilities Gordon E. Brown Jr. (Stanford University and Stanford Synchrotron Radiation Laboratory), Georges Calas (Université de Paris 6 et 7), and Russell J. Hemley (Carnegie Institution of Washington)
- Accessing User Facilities and Making Your Research Experience Successful Richard J. Reeder (Stony Brook University) and Antonio Lanzirotti (University of Chicago)
- New Opportunities at Emerging Facilities John B. Parise (Stony Brook University) and Gordon E. Brown Jr. (Stanford University and Stanford Synchrotron Radiation Laboratory)
2005 Topics
- Fluids in Planetary Systems (January 2005 )
- Diamonds (March 2005)
- Genesis: Rocks, Minerals, and the Geochemical Origin of Life (June 2005)
- Toxic Metals in the Environment: The Role of Surfaces (September 2005)
- Large Igneous Provinces: Origin and Environmental Consequences (December 2005 )
Thematic Articles
Episodically, the Earth erupts large quantities of basaltic magma in geologically short periods of time. This results in the formation of large igneous provinces, which include continental flood basalt provinces, volcanic rifted margins, and giant oceanic plateaus. These fluctuations in the Earth’s system are still poorly understood. Do they owe their origin to mantle plumes, meteorite impacts, or lithosphere-controlled processes? Whatever their origin they correlate closely with major changes in oceanic and atmospheric chemistry and may trigger global mass extinctions.
Mantle plumes are columns of hot, solid material that originate deep in the mantle, probably at the core–mantle boundary. Laboratory and numerical models replicating conditions appropriate to the mantle show that mantle plumes have a regular and predictable shape that allows a number of testable predictions to be made. New mantle plumes are predicted to consist of a large head, 1000 km in diameter, followed by a narrower tail. Initial eruption of basalt from a plume head should be preceded by ~1000 m of domal uplift. High-temperature magmas are expected to dominate the first eruptive products of a new plume and should be concen- trated near the centre of the volcanic province. All of these predictions are confirmed by observations.
When continental crust gets too thick, the dense eclogitic bottom detaches, causing uplift, asthenospheric upwelling, and pressure- release melting. Delamination introduces warm blocks of lower crust with a low melting point into the mantle; these eventually heat up, ascend, decompress, and melt. The mantle below 100 km depth is mainly below the melting point of dry peridotite, but its temperature will be above the melting point of recycled fertile (basaltic or eclogitic) components, obviating the need for excess temperature to form “hotspots” or “melting anomalies”. When plates pull apart or delaminate, the mantle upwells; entrained crustal fragments of various ages are fertile and create melting anomalies along developing mid-ocean ridges, fracture zones, and old suture zones. Eclogites associated with delamination are warmer and less dense than subducted oceanic crust and more susceptible to melting and entrainment.
Ameteorite impacting on the surface of the Earth produces not only a crater but also, if the impactor is sufficiently large, high melt volumes. Computer simulations suggest that, in addition to shock- induced melting produced by impact, additional decompression melting of the hot target mantle beneath the crater can produce melt volumes comparable to those found in large igneous provinces (LIPs). The coincidence between the expected frequency of such impact events combined with the similarity in magma volumes of LIPs suggests that large meteorite impacts may be capable of triggering LIPs and mantle hotspots from a point source which is subsequently buried. Can the impact model explain any LIP? What are the distinctive macroscopic criteria predicted from an impact model, and how may they be recognised or rejected in the geological record of the Earth?
Subaerial continental flood basalt volcanism is distinguished from all other volcanic activity by the repeated effusion of huge batches of basaltic magma (~102–103 km3 per eruption) over short periods of geologic time (<1 Myr). Flood basalt provinces are constructed of thick stacks of extensive pahoehoe-dominated lava flow fields and are the products of hundreds of eruptions. Each huge eruption comes from a dyke-fed fissure tens to hundreds of kilometres long and lasts about a decade or more. Such spatial and temporal patterns of lava production do not occur at any other time in Earth history, and, during eruptions, gas fluxes of ~1 Gt per year of SO2 and CO2 over periods of a decade or more are possible. Importantly, the atmospheric cooling associated with aerosols generated from the SO2 emis- sions of just one flood basalt eruption is likely to have been severe and would have persisted for a decade or longer. By contrast, warming due to volca- nogenic CO2 released during an eruption is estimated to have been insignifi- cant because the mass of CO2 would have been small compared to that already present in the atmosphere.
Oceanic plateaus represent large areas (~1 ×× 106 km2) of thickened oceanic crust formed from rapidly erupted lava (<3 Myr). These plateaus have formed throughout most of geological time. They generally correlate with periods of environmental catastrophe characterised by oceanic anoxia, leading to black shale formation and mass extinction events. Such correlations are particularly evident in the Cretaceous and can be partly attributed to the release of CO2 during oceanic plateau formation, which ultimately resulted in a runaway greenhouse effect. Additionally, sea level rise and disruption of oceanic circulation patterns by displacement of seawater during plateau formation contributed to increased environmental stress and biotic extinction.
In the past 300 million years, there has been a near-perfect association between extinction events and the eruption of large igneous provinces, but proving the nature of the causal links is far from resolved. The asso- ciated environmental changes often include global warming and the develop- ment of widespread oxygen-poor conditions in the oceans. This implicates a role for volcanic CO2 emissions, but other perturbations of the global carbon cycle, such as release of methane from gas hydrate reservoirs or shut-down of photosynthesis in the oceans, are probably required to achieve severe green- house warming. The best links between extinction and eruption are seen in the interval from 300 to 150 Ma. With the exception of the Deccan Trap eruptions (65 Ma), the emplacement of younger volcanic provinces has been generally associated with significant environmental changes but little or no increase in extinction rates above background levels.
